As I read through
Pathways to the Common Core I realize just how simple yet complex everything really is. "The adoption of the Common Core suggests that America's image of what it means to be educated will change." (pg. 10) This is a very exciting yet terrifying idea if we really think about it. We talk about and criticize and debate our education system all the time, now we are debating what it actually means to be educated.
We say our focus is on our students and throughout my reading I continued to see evidence of this. One thing that really squared my thinking was "The CCSS emphasize that every student needs to be given access to this work. Students with IEPs still need to be taught to question an author's bias, to argue for a claim, to synthesize information across texts." (pg. 12) I often feel as though our students with IEPs are given this label of not having to do as much work or having to learn the same material as those students who do not have IEPs which is extremely bothersome to me. It is our job as teachers to make sure we are providing all of our students opportunities to be successful in the real world, not just those that are mainstream. "Its no longer okay to provide the vast majority of America's children with a fill-in-the-blank, answer-the-questions, read-the-paragraph curriculum that equips them to take their place on the assembly line." (pg. 9) I really appreciate this because I have heard so many teachers make excuses for students, or teach lessons that are simply easier for them to plan and manage, but where do our students and their future come into play? We aren't growing CEO's, investors, inventors, or even educators by simply asking for one worded, black and white answers.
Pathways to the Common Core talks about the necessary steps we as teachers or educators need to take in order to ensure we are headed the right direction for our students. "The first thing we want to stress to anyone who is interested in standards-based reform is that the Common Core is, above all, a call for accelerating students' literacy development. The most important message centers on lifting he level of student achievement, not on course coverage and compliance." (pg. 14) The Common Core requires us to decompose standards and teach in a way that makes sense and is engaging to our students. It is not asking us to simply have them regurgitate different information. It is giving our students the ability to actually read a text, decompose the meaning behind it, teach it to someone else and have a conversation about the meaning and reason behind the literature. As a math and science teacher I sometimes, although am not proud of this, find myself wondering why I need to know all of the reading and ELA information now. However, after reading this book I realize that it is just as important for me as a science teacher to understand the Reading Common Core standards as it is for the Reading teacher to understand them. "Because reading will no longer be the domain solely of ELA teachers, as it has been in most schools, science and social studies teachers will need to participate in professional development on reading instruction." (pg 30) I know that I try to incorporate reading when possible throughout my science lessons, and I definitely do a better job of incorporating writing throughout my science lessons through hypothesis, observations, etc, but it is difficult to find a good balance between reading and experiments in a subject area where students can benefit so much from hands on learning yet class time is constantly being cut. I realized as I was reading this quote "You will also want to think about ways to infuse a lot more information reading into all of your content-area classes." (pg 93) that this is going to be the best way for me to help incorporate literature into my science or math block. giving my students an opportunity to read further and deeper into topics we have not had time to discuss in depth in class will be a great way for them to meet both standards. I need to remember that "...kids are reading non-fiction to figure out what to do with their lives." (pg. 91) and my job as their teacher is to help guide them and open opportunities for them to do so.
As I continue to think forward about the different things I want to incorporate within my teaching and my classroom I realize that although I put a lot of emphasis on learning and inquiry and hands-on projects, I feel as though my goal is still for them to "memorize" something for the test. When I read "This work is not about reading to be entertained. Nor is it about reading to memorize. It is about reading to think." (pg 101) I realized that this is what my mindset should be and this is the type of learning I need to be sure I am expressing to my students. My students need to understand, and I need to explain to them, that we are here to think.
One topic that seems to come up over and over again at my school is training or lack there of. As a new teacher I realize that I am entering into the Common Core probably at a good time because other than my personal education I have never known anything different. One problem that I personally have, and one that seems to be a problem for several colleagues, is the idea of training so we as teachers can ensure we are doing our very best for our students. The book discusses how now more than ever our education systems are low on money and having budget cuts however it also states that "The only expense is that of providing teachers with the professional development and the teaching resources they need to become knowledgeable in this area." (pg. 16) I realize that training takes money and time and that this is not a cheap affair however I personally believe that teachers would feel way more comfortable and would be much more likely to cooperate in certain criteria, if they felt as though they were informed and trained on what they should or shouldn't be doing. This goes into the whole idea of time as well. We as teachers have so many demands placed on us with such large classes that it often times for me feels like I am trying to cram everything in at once. Maybe this is where part of the idea of memorization comes into play that I mentioned earlier. I really was able to get a better sense for what a day should look like through the standards of the Common Core. Time is a necessity. We can't expect our students to obtain this information through osmosis overnight. "...when students are actually taught writing and given opportunities to write an hour a day within a writing workshop, their skills develop in a very visible fashion." (pg. 17) Reading this really helped to point me in the right direction of what is important and what can wait. When I read that "Students in the classrooms of more effective teachers read ten times as much as students in classrooms of less effective teachers." (pg. 51) I again realized where the importance in my classroom should reside even though I am a STEM teacher. As I think about what matters to me and what concerns me in my school I realize that I need to first focus on what I can control and what I need to change. "If you are going to take important steps to radically improve your students' experiences in information reading, you will probably need to start by owning the problems in our classroom and your school - and frankly, our hunch is the problems are serious." (pg 88) This book really has pointed me in the right direction for several unanswered questions.
I still have a few questions though that certain parts of the book really brought to life for me. One of my biggest questions or complaints I guess, is the expectation that some teacher somewhere will catch a student up. Or on the other hand, I don't have time to worry about this specific student this year so next year's teacher can catch him up. I am a firm believer in the idea that every teacher is responsible for doing their very best to teach their grade levels expectations to every student. I have a very hard time understanding why school systems are passing students onto the next grade when they aren't on grade level and haven't even been doing the work. In my opinion you are in a sense harming that child's education even more because you are now placing them somewhere that is way over their head and making it even more difficult for them to feel in control of things. "The CCSS design is also one of the strongest features of the standards because it sends a message loud an clear: Growth takes time; it can't be the job of a fourth-grade teacher, or the tenth-grade teacher, to be sure students reach the expectations for that grade level." (pg. 11) I completely agree that growth takes time and that we can't measure this overnight. I also completely agree that it takes time and practice for students to really grasp and understand a concept. However, I do think that each grade level teacher has a responsibility to teach and expose their students to those standards and that they should not assume that another teacher somewhere will fill in the gap for them. I found it interesting when I read "when you and your school make the decisions about a way to teach students, you are also thinking about a way to recruit and retain teachers." (pg 74) This makes sense to me but shouldn't we be concerned more about the students and how our teaching styles and decisions will ultimately be effecting them and their education and their future? "Kids don't just need good classrooms, they need good schools." (pg.73) and it is our job as educators to ensure we are helping each other form these good schools but how do we make this happen if we aren't all on the same page?